Apr 28, 2025

Haryana CET 2025 Notification

 

हरियाणा CET Group C भर्ती 2025 | पूरी जानकारी हिंदी में | अभी आवेदन करें!


HSSC CET 2025

Apr 10, 2025

Parmila vs. HPSC

 Parmila vs. HPSC — LPA No. 329 of 2024 & CWP No. 17188 of 2024

FACTS OF THE CASE:

  1. Advertisement by HPSC:

    • Advt. No. 29/2023 & 44/2023 dated 24.06.2023.
    • 250 posts of PGT (Maths) for rest of Haryana & 65 posts for Mewat cadre.
    • 3-stage selection process:
      1. Screening Test – qualifying (cut-off 25%)
      2. Subject Knowledge Test – 87.5% weightage (cut-off 35%)
      3. Interview – 12.5% weightage
  2. Dispute Origin:

    • Parmila (BC-B category) scored 41.85 marks in Screening Test.
    • She was excluded from next stage due to BC-B category cut-off being higher.
    • Meanwhile, General category candidates with lower marks (38.04 – 41.58) were selected for the Subject Knowledge Test.
  3. Parmila’s Argument:

    • She should have been considered under General category based on merit.
    • Quoted Supreme Court judgments that merit > category and migration is allowed even at earlier stages.

LEGAL ISSUE:

Can a reserved category candidate who scores more than the General category cut-off in the screening test be considered under the General (Open) category at that stage?




ARGUMENTS FOR MIGRATION AT SCREENING STAGE:



  1. Supreme Court Precedents:

    • Saurav Yadav v. State of U.P. (2021):
      • Open category is not exclusive to general caste.
      • Reserved category candidates can occupy unreserved seats based on merit at any stage.
    • Sadhana Singh Dangi (2022) & Ramnaresh (2024):
      • Denying reserved candidates seats in open category based on merit is discriminatory and violates Article 14.
    • Indra Sawhney Case (1992): Reservation is about representation, not restriction.
  2. Interpretation of “Open Category”:

    • Meant for anyone irrespective of caste, provided merit is higher.
    • Category-wise shortlisting must not override merit at any stage.
  3. Constitutional Logic (R.K. Sabharwal, 1995):

    • Reserved category candidates selected on merit should not be counted against quota.
    • Hence, they should compete in open pool first.


  4. Justice Ravindra Bhat (Saurav Yadav, concurring):

    “If merit is sacrificed in the name of category, it defeats the purpose of open competition.”

     


ARGUMENTS AGAINST MIGRATION (HPSC's View):

  1. Precedent from Punjab & Haryana HC in Naveen Rao (2019) and others:

    • Migration is only allowed at final selection, not screening.
    • Screening is just a qualifying test, not part of final merit.
    • Cut-offs must be applied category-wise at screening stage.
  2. M.P. High Court view (Pushpendra Patel case, 2023):

    • Screening is for shortlisting, not comparative merit.
    • Migration applies only where merit list is drawn, i.e., after main exam.
  3. Chattar Singh v. State of Rajasthan (SC 1997):

    • Candidates opted for reservation category and cannot claim open seats later.



HIGH COURT’S FINAL RULING (April 9, 2025):



  1. Rejects Commission’s Argument:

    • Even if screening is not counted in final merit, it’s still a decisive stage.
    • Excluding meritorious reserved candidates from open category undermines fairness.
  2. Clarifies the Rule:

    • First, prepare an Open Category list (4x posts) including all candidates based on merit, irrespective of category.
    • Then, prepare reserved category-wise lists based on cut-offs.
    • This approach aligns with SC guidelines and Article 14 of the Constitution.

  1. Result:

    • Parmila is allowed to appear for Subject Knowledge Test.
    • HPSC must revise screening result as per merit + open category inclusion.


“The Constitution demands equality of opportunity. If a reserved category candidate scores more than general cut-off, excluding them just because of their category violates Article 14.”



key legal points:

  • Open category = open for all (SC: Saurav Yadav).
  • Merit must always prevail, even during shortlisting.
  • Denial of such migration is arbitrary and unconstitutional.


“Screening test is not just a formality. If it decides who moves to the next stage, it’s a gatekeeper—and it must follow the constitutional principle of merit-first.”




Apr 7, 2025

SCERT Class 6-8 Monthwise Distribution of Syllabus 2025-26

 

Class 6-8 Monthwise Distribution of Syllabus 2025-26
English
Accessible Version : View  (349 KB) /  
Hindi
Accessible Version : View  (245 KB) /  
Maths(English Medium)
Accessible Version : View  (100 KB) /  
Maths(Hindi Medium)
Accessible Version : View  (167 KB) /  
Home Science
Accessible Version : View  (188 KB) /  
Sanskrit
Accessible Version : View  (201 KB) /  
Vadan
Accessible Version : View  (203 KB) /  

SCERT Class 1-5 Monthwise Distribution of Syllabus 2025-26

Click on view to download the syllabus 
Class 1-5 Monthwise Distribution of Syllabus 2025-26
English
Accessible Version : View  (182 KB) /  
Hindi
Accessible Version : View  (137 KB) /  
Maths(English Medium)
Accessible Version : View  (215 KB) /  
Maths(Hindi Medium)
Accessible Version : View  (165 KB) /  
EVS(English Medium)
Accessible Version : View  (249 KB) /  
EVS(Hindi Medium)
Accessible Version : View  (137 KB) /  

Apr 2, 2025

KVS Exam Quiz:3

KVS General Part Quiz

KVS General Part Quiz (KVS Recruitment Exam 2023)

Apr 1, 2025

KVS TGT General Part Quiz: 2

KVS 2023 TGT Librarian Quiz

KVS 2023 TGT LIBRARIAN EXAM QUIZ

JOIN OUR WHATSAPP GROUP: CLICK HERE
JOIN OUR WHATSAPP GROUP: CLICK HERE
JOIN OUR WHATSAPP GROUP: CLICK HERE

BRIDGE PROGRAMME FOR CLASS 3


DOWNLOAD BRIDGE PROGRAMME FOR CLASS III


ENGLISH
CLICK HERE



HINDI
CLICK HERE



MATHS 
CLICK HERE



EVS
CLICK HERE